Damian Thompson: The Omen

I have responded to this article in the Telegraph.

I have issue with what he says about the bloggers. Most of us are honest decent people who wish to propagate the truth about our heavily censored media and the way the government and the TV hypnotise us with NLP, and silly ads asking for our five a day ( which by the way was a marketing campaign in the sixties and has no basis in any scientific truth}

Yes the people are led quite literally to the slaughter. What will our descendants think of us? We'll certainly know in 60 years time By that time even by conservative estimates if the Muslim population has multiplied by 64 in Norway, then it will be a majority Muslim country. I don't condone violence. Especially not murder, I have had a friend murdered and it is not a nice thing by any stretch of the imagination . If you want bloodthirsty literature read the Quran ( Online even and in several translations)

Was Anders Breivik an internet troll? I’m sorry if that seems a flippant question to ask about a man who killed dozens of Norwegian teenagers, but you can’t read his 1,500-page “manifesto” without being struck by how thoroughly he trawled the web. Whatever the explanation for his murderous actions, this was definitely a brain warped by the blogosphere.

For readers unfamiliar with blogs, I should explain what I mean by “troll”. The word can be used to describe two types of commenters who write underneath published posts. There are simple-minded folk with jokey nicknames who fling insults at each other for hours at a stretch, amusing no one but themselves. My own blog is infested with them. Honestly, I sometimes wish they would crawl away and die. Then there are the pyjama-clad pseudonymous obsessives whose fingers are calloused from rattling out the truth about the “EUSSR”, BBC bias, Big Pharma, Zionists, Islam etc.

These trolls aren’t confined to the far Left or the far Right: some of the most noxious internet bores turn out to be Liberal Democrats. It’s true that, on the whole, their views tend to be controversial, but the essence of their trolling is their rhetorical style: in particular, an insistence that they know the truth about everything. All they really have in common – apart from an aversion to deodorant – is hysterical omniscience.

Speaking as someone who hates the way the mainstream media suck up to radical Muslims, I find it frustrating that websites devoted to monitoring Islamism are dominated by trolls and writers who play up to them. I don’t trust a word that the BBC tells me about “the religion of peace” – but equally, I can’t trust either the articles or the comments on the Gates of Vienna or Jihad Watch websites. (This I learnt the hard way, by quoting on my own blog an anecdote about Muslims besieging a hospital that turned out to be an urban myth.)

This is my reply

"Then there are the pyjama-clad pseudonymous obsessives whose fingers are
calloused from rattling out the truth about the “EUSSR”, BBC bias, Big
Pharma, Zionists, Islam etc."

Well I am not pyjama clad neither do I have calloused fingers nor am I obsessive nor do I have pseudonymous blogs everyone knows what my pseudonym is. I must tell you though that you would do well to read the Hadith, the Quran and the other books around that era, to understand the "religion of peace".

Frankly from my point of view, Muslims have killed over 250 million Hindus, from the year 800AD to the present day ( if thats peaceful I'll eat my hat publically)

The Jewish Holocaust pales in comparison. The Mountain range Hindu Kush for example: Kush is the word for killing, Now tell me why would a mountain range be called that unless it had killed a fair few Hindus in its time? * khud kushi* being the two words for suicide Killing oneself being the literal translation"

as for the Gujurati Woman You will notice that she is Muslim Why would she bother, shes not supposed to bother according to the Quran. Frankly she wants to enjoy her conjugal rights and the world be damned, and the Human rights law is a convenient tool in her arsenal to get what she wants despite the law saying otherwise.

For your information the Coptic Christians predate Islam, theyve been around since AD248 Why doesnt islam conform to the older religion? Ask yourself that

As for Anders Breivik how do we know he wasn't trained by Mossad?/CIA/Vatican and brainwashed? We don't

He hasnt said anything, he didn't even know how many he had killed He asked his lawyer for the number of dead ones

Considering that I remember grave mistakes on my part, what the hell ? Can he not remember killing that many on Utoya? Did he lose count? What? You'll have to forgive me but Im only up to page 454 of his manifest and I dont believe anyone who says theyve read it cover to cover properly in the last week. Its too long and you have to cross reference it at every stage.

So you sir are a liar. You have not read it in its entirety and understood it for what it is at present.

Ein Volk, Ein Reich, Ein EU , Ein EU Presidente

One people, one state, one Europe. And you're paying to push it.

I give you just one example of the hundreds of millions of euros of taxpayers' money spent every year on pro-EU propaganda. This fellow on the left is Captain Euro ('born Adam Andros, the only son of a famous European Ambassador'), meant to be a superhero. He was invented by a firm of 'corporate vision strategists' on the orders of the European Commission. He stars in animated films paid for by taxpayers' money and which are broadcast through the internet and television. The official line is, 'Captain Euro is the symbol of European unity and values.'
The villain opposing him is, naturally, the evil Dr D. Vider -- get it, Divider? Dr Vider is described as 'a ruthless speculator' which in Brussels code means anybody who supports the kind of free market economics the British do best and the French hate.
Captain Euro is tripe. But the propaganda drive he represents is no joke. A report just out today from the Swedish thinktank Timbro gives 25 pages of details on how the European institutions spend hundreds of millions of euros each year on what they call 'communication,' but anyone else would recognise as pro-EU, anti-national propaganda. None of it is information, all of it is taxpayer-funded marketing and advocacy for 'an ever closer union.'

And on and on the list goes. You can find the details at www.timbro.se All of the millions are taken from taxpayers, and all of it with a single aim: one people, one state.
Which is an aim with a very European pedigree in propaganda, though we are used to hearing it in the original German.


The above appears in the Mail.

I love Europe I love the idea of the common market, the ability to hop to france easily but I cannot stand the empire building.

Married to the Mob

Dan Hannan has been desperately searching for someone who will admit an intention to vote for Brown's shower of shit on June 4th. He eventually found one.

She was a pretty, friendly, gently-spoken single mother in her mid-thirties, and she had voted Labour all her life. "What, even this time?" I asked, genuinely startled. "I suppose it's like a marriage," she said, loyally. "You shouldn't walk out just because you're angry about something".


An interesting analogy.

We can assume, then, that she would stay with a hypothetical spouse who lied about his intentions in order to move in, then proceeded to take as much of her money as he could grab to give to his mates or the next door neighbours. She wouldn't leave when he dictates how she should live her life, by banning her from doing things she enjoyed, and taking more cash off her if she wished to continue doing other things she has always done. She'd also not pack her bags if he decided to watch her every move and demand that he know exactly where she was at any minute of the day or night, and if he was suspicious of her, to be able to keep her locked up in the basement for up to 42 days. She wouldn't even run bawling to her mum's place if he racked up huge debts on her credit card but, instead of economising, decided to spend his way out of it, thereby putting her in debt for the rest of her natural days. And she'd still snuggle up to him of an evening even when she realised that, while she was eating beans and dry toast during the hard times, he was raiding her bank account to gorge himself on chateaubriand and champagne.

Not really a marriage, is it? More like domestic abuse.


From Dick Puddlecote